Focused discovery
Short conversations to establish the tools already in use, the work they support and the information that moves through them.
AI policy and staff training · Ireland
Your staff are using AI.
Make it responsible.
Article 4 of the EU AI Act has required providers and deployers to support AI literacy since February 2025. TechEvolveAI helps Irish organisations turn that broad obligation into a practical policy, role-aware training and an adoption record their team can use.
Operational and governance advisory, not legal advice or a compliance certification.
Designed for
Irish organisations whose teams already use AI tools at work and need a proportionate, workable operating position—not a generic policy that nobody follows.
Start with the real use
Does this apply to your organisation?
If staff use ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini or other AI tools for work, the starting point is to understand what they use, what information passes through those tools and where people rely on the output. The question is not whether every tool needs the same control; it is whether the organisation has taken proportionate, informed measures for its people and context.
A short, owned policy and training programme creates the working baseline: what is permitted, what is not, who decides, what gets checked and where staff can ask for help when the tool or use case changes.
Fixed-price programme
Policy, training and a usable record.
A practical, fixed-price scope adapted to your organisation’s sector, people and actual AI use—not a generic policy dropped into a shared drive.
AI Use Policy
Plain-English permitted and prohibited uses, oversight, sign-off, tool approval and accountable ownership.
Sector guidance
A companion note covering the risks and decisions that matter in your sector and working context.
Two training sessions
One practical session for staff and one deeper working session for leaders or higher-risk roles.
Handover support
Management walkthrough, adoption checklist and a 30-day question window as the policy starts being used.
Two common mistakes
Training and policy need to fit the work.
One generic module for everyone
Article 4 calls for measures that take account of people’s knowledge, experience, roles, use context and affected groups. A short awareness module can help, but it is not automatically enough for every organisation, role or use case.
One session, then no operating routine
AI tools, suppliers and working practices change quickly. A policy needs a named owner, a way to approve or stop new uses, and a review trigger so the original training is not the last time the question is considered.
Clear commercial starting points
Start at the level your organisation needs.
Focused first step
AI Act readiness check
€500 + VAT
Half a day to review the AI use you know about, identify immediate exposure and provide a concise findings note with the clearest next actions.
Request the readiness checkFull programme
Policy & Training Programme
€6,000 + VAT
Six consultant days delivered within four weeks of start: focused discovery, AI Use Policy, sector guidance, two sessions, adoption materials and 30-day support.
Discuss the full programmeOptional depth
AI use inventory & risk review
From €3,500 + VAT
A deeper review of known AI tools and uses, producing a tool register, risk assessment and prioritised actions. It can be added before or after the programme.
Discuss the risk reviewScope, timing and suitability are confirmed before work starts. No funding support is assumed or represented as part of this offer.
Why TechEvolveAI
Built by someone who works with the systems.
TechEvolveAI combines independent enterprise AI delivery with hands-on product work. The advisory is designed for the point where policy meets real tools, information flows, people and decisions—not as abstract governance theatre.
For broader role, inventory, transparency and high-risk orientation, use the EU AI Act Readiness guide . It is a practical resource, not a legal opinion.
Direct answers
Questions business owners ask.
Does this apply to a small organisation?
Size does not decide whether Article 4 is relevant. The key questions are whether the organisation provides or deploys AI systems, who uses them and the context of that use. The response should be proportionate to the organisation and its actual risks.
Will this make us “AI Act compliant”?
No responsible adviser can make that promise from a generic web page. The programme creates practical policy, training and evidence that help an organisation meet its operating responsibilities. Formal legal interpretation and assurance belong with appropriately qualified legal advisers.
Can this work for a regulated or high-trust sector?
Yes, where the scope is adapted to the sector and reviewed with the organisation’s own legal, privacy, risk and security functions where needed. The programme does not replace those accountable functions.
What if we do not know what staff are using?
That is a common starting point. The readiness check or discovery phase establishes a focused picture of known tools, use cases, information flows and decisions before recommendations are made.
Current regulatory position
Article 4 entered into application on 2 February 2025. The European Commission explains that the supervision and enforcement framework now applies through national market-surveillance authorities. Ireland has a distributed competent-authority model coordinated by the AI Office of Ireland.